| Literature Review Rubric | Marks Earned | |||
| Literature Review Rubric | 15-10 | 10-5 | 5-0 | 13 |
| Introduction: · Provides rationale for student selection of literature · Discussed search terms and techniques. · Demonstrates the need for this research question · Identifies if there is a theoretical or conceptual framework | Meets all outlined criteria and is succinct and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question | Does not meet one of the criteria but is well organized, and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question. | Does not meet two or more of the criteria and/ or is not organized, and sufficient. The reader cannot conclude the “so what”. | Highlighted in yellow were not addressed. |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| Clinical Question · Includes the clinical question | Clinical question is clearly stated | Clinical question can be implied but was not clearly stated. | Clinical question was not stated and/or were not apparent from the literature review. | Highlighted in yellow were not addressed. |
| 30-20 | 20-10 | 10-0 | 15 | |
| Background Uses established critical appraisal criteria to evaluate each study essential components of each reviewed study. Including but not limited to: · Type and size of sample · Reliability and validity of instruments · Methodology · Consistency of data collection and procedures · Appropriate data analysis · Identification of limitations | The summary reflects the essential components of for all studies | The summary reflects most (lacking 2 or more elements) of the essential components for one or all of the studies | The summary reflects most (lacking 4 or more elements) of the essential components for either study | Highlighted in green was not addressed across all articles. You were expected to identify these elements in each article . |
| 25-15 | 15-10 | 10-5 | 20 | |
| Conclusion: · Refection on the analysis and synthesis of material · Identifies gaps and inconsistencies · Summarizes overall strengths and weaknesses of the studies reviewed · Discuss similarities and differences | Meets criteria. Is well organized, follow’s a logical sequence that allows the reader to arrive at a logical conclusion? | Does not meet 1-2 of the criteria but is organized, and/or demonstrates illogical sequencing or structure. | Does not meet >two or more of the criteria and/or is weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure. Conclusions cannot be made. | You did a good job. However, you did not get full credit because you did not support with evidence-based literature. |
| 10-7 | 6-4 | 3-0 | 10 | |
| Grammar · See Turn-It-In for SPerr= spelling error | There are no major grammatical errors (<3 SPerr) | There are a few grammatical errors. (<5 SPerr) | There are major grammatical errors. (>5 SPerr) | |
| Automatic 5 point deduction per page | ||||
| Length | Exceed OR does not meet 3 – 5 page criteria by more than 2 page | |||
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
| Articles · Selects 5 Primary sources · Dated within last 5 years · All sources are from peer reviewed journal · At least one source is from a nursing journal | Meets all criteria | Does not meet one of the criteria | Does not meet two or more of the criteria | |
| 10-8 | 7-5 | 4-0 | 10 | |
| Support and Referencing: · See Turn-It-In for SEE SON INTEGRITY STATEMENT | Incorporates the text, course materials, and selected readings; does not use Wikipedia or other non-academic resources. There are minimal to no errors informatting, Referencing and style. And | There are moderate errors in APA Formatting, style, and referencing. | Severe errors in APA style, formatting, or referencing. Violates the School of Nursing Student’s Personal Integrity Statement more than 2 times | |
| Total: | 78 | |||
| *All students will be given the opportunity to resubmit this assignment by Thursday 2359 of the same week that the assignment was graded if the Student participated in the LITERATURE REVIEW PEER REVIEW FORUM per discussion forum guidelines. An automatic 20 % deduction will be assessed to the re-graded submission. | ||||
| Comments: | You did a good job. However, you did not address important items on the rubric. You can resubmit by Friday 7/29/22 for regrading. Make sure you highlight all corrections/changes, or it will not be graded. Dr. Bright | |||
| Final Grade | 78 |
TOO MANY ASSIGNMENTS? Let our professional Essay Writers help you!
Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee
Note: Every paper is crafted by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
The art of writing is far from simple; even experienced writers can face challenges. This led to the inception of WriterCentre.com. Comprising a team of writers, we offer comprehensive essay, dissertation, and thesis writing services to students. Our mission at WriterCentre.com is to provide unparalleled quality to clients pursuing undergraduate, Masters, or PhD studies.
Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.
Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.
Our writers are committed to assisting you through every project phase, from conception to completion. Whether you require topic selection or comprehensive project support, our writers work diligently to ensure your essay, thesis, dissertation, or other projects are delivered punctually. Adhering to your instructions is second nature to our highly trained writers. We understand the stress of impending deadlines, having experienced it ourselves. Hence, we strive to meet even the most challenging timeframes. Do not hesitate to reach out, even when the timeline appears insurmountable. Your academic journey is our concern.
We write essays from scratch and within your selected time frame.
