D031: Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice

ASM1 — ASM1 TASK 1: INNOVATION PROPOSAL

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee

Note: Every paper is crafted by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.

Create an innovation plan proposal using the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template.”

A. Introduce your innovation proposal by doing the following:

1. Explain the role of an innovative nurse leader.

2. Summarize the community of practice (CoP) established during your CPE, including the following points:

a. organizational characteristics, services provided, and size of the service area

b. demographic characteristics of the population served

c. team member roles—formal and informal

d. shared team values

3. Focusing on the organization identified in your CPE, discuss the internal and external factors that prompted this proposal.

4. Assess how your proposed innovation aligns to other professional, regulatory, and/or governmental strategic initiatives.

5. Construct a purpose statement for your proposed innovation.

PUB 550: Application and Interpretation of Public Health Data

6. Create a goal of the proposed innovation in SMART+C format (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timed, and Challenging).

B. Complete a review of relevant sources by doing the following:

1. Identify five scholarly peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years that are relevant to your innovation proposal.

2. Complete the Relevant Sources Summary Table in the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template.””

3. Identify the evidence strength and the hierarchy of each source, using the WGU levels of evidence hierarchy outlined in the attached “WGU Levels of Evidence” document.

4. Synthesize your findings by identifying patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature as they relate to the proposed innovation.

5. Develop recommendations for the proposed innovation based on the literature.

C. Discuss the data-collection methods and technology used to identify and support the proposed innovation by doing the following:

1. Explain the process you used to generate ideas for an innovation from the CoP.

2. Provide examples of big and small data within your current healthcare setting.

3. Discuss how big data could be used to support the proposed innovation.

4. Describe technology enhancements required for the proposed innovation.

NOTE: A technology enhancement could be the development of a new technology or enhanced application of an existing technology.

D. Discuss how to support interprofessional collaboration in the midst of disruptive innovation by doing the following:

1. Analyze how disruption from the proposed innovation could impact individuals, processes, and organizations.

2. Develop strategies to mitigate the challenges of disruption for individuals, processes, and organizations.

3. Discuss how the proposed innovation can leverage benefits of disruptive innovation for cost-effective, quality healthcare outcomes.

E. Discuss your pre-implementation plan by doing the following:

1. Discuss diffusion of innovation as it relates to the implementation of your plan.

NOTE: Refer to the COS for Roger’s Theory.

2. Identify the roles and responsibilities of team members needed to implement your proposal using the Innovation Action Plan table in the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template” including information that is practical, accurate, and relevant to the proposed innovation. ”

3. Discuss the financial implications of implementing the proposed innovation.

4. Develop an interprofessional communication plan accounting for the logistics (i.e., the who, what, when, and where) of facilitating the innovation and its usability.

5. Discuss how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed innovation.

F. Conclude your innovation proposal by doing the following:

1. Reiterate the purpose and rationale for your proposed innovation.

2. Reflect on your experience identifying an innovation for your setting.

3. Discuss the strengths and challenges of the process used for developing this innovation plan.

4. Discuss how you will apply what you have learned for future initiatives.

G. Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting in your paper:

• bias-free language

• APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective

• a title page and headers

• in-text citations and references

• APA-specific formatting rules for margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page and main body of your paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures

H. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Title of Evidence-Based Innovation Plan 

Author Name (First, Middle Initial, Last)

College of Health Professions, Western Governors University

D031: Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice

Instructor Name

Date

Title of Evidence-Based Innovation Plan 

Introduction (Introduce your innovation proposal in 2-3 sentences)

Explanation of Role

Organizational Characteristics

Demographics
Team Members Roles

Shared Team Values

Discussion of Internal and External Factors

Alignment to Strategic Initiatives

Purpose Statement

Innovation Goal

Relevant Sources Review

Table 1

Relevant Sources Summary Table

Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Sources Published in Past 5 Years  that Support the Proposed Innovation	Summary of Findings Relevant to Proposed Innovation	Evidence Strength Level I–VII	Evidence Hierarchy
	APA formatted scholarly reference with a DOI or retrievable link.	Present a detailed summary of the findings and how the findings support the proposed innovation.	Refer to WGU Levels of Evidence
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 1
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 2
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 3
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 4
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 5

Synthesis of Literature

Recommendations

Data-Collection and Technology  

Idea Generation Process

Data Examples

Big Data Support

Technology Enhancements

Interprofessional Collaboration and Disruptive Innovation

Disruption

Strategies to Mitigate Challenges

Leverage Benefits of Disruptive Innovation

Plan

Diffusion of Innovation

Innovation Action Plan Table

Table 2

Innovation Action Plan

Team Member Role	Essential Responsibilities to Implement Proposal	Timeline

Financial Implications

Interprofessional Communication Plan

Evaluation

Conclusion

Purpose and Rationale

Reflection

Strengths and Challenges

Future Initiatives

References

WGU Levels of Evidence 7 Level Model for Rating Evidence
Strength of Evidence	Evidence Hierarchy	Types of Studies
Level I	Ø  Meta-analysis Ø  Systematic Review Ø  Integrative Review Ø  National Practice Guideline	Ø  Meta-analyses Ø  Systematic Reviews Ø  Integrative Reviews Ø  National Practice Guidelines
This level includes research designs of Meta-Analyses, Systematic Reviews, Integrative Reviews, National Practice Guidelines (Evidence-based practice guidelines housed in national repositories that were developed from systematic reviews).
Level II	Ø  Randomized Controlled Trial Ø  Experimental	Ø  Randomized Controlled Trials Ø  Experimental studies
This level represents evidence from studies using a true experimental design.
Level III	Ø  Quasi-experimental	Ø  Quasi-experimental studies (experiments without randomization)
This level represents evidence obtained from experimental studies without randomization.
Level IV	Ø  Non-experimental	Ø  Retrospective Ø  Case control Ø  Cross-sectional Ø  Cohort-comparison Ø  Prospective Ø  Descriptive Ø  Correlational single studies
This level represents evidence from well-designed non-experimental studies such as retrospective, case-control, cross-sectional, cohort comparison, prospective, descriptive, and correlational single studies.
Level V	Ø  Meta-synthesis	Ø  Meta-syntheses
This level represents evidence from systematic reviews of studies using qualitative methods.
Level VI	Ø  Single Qualitative Study	Ø  Qualitative studies
This level represents single studies using a qualitative research method.
Level VII	Ø  Expert Opinion	Ø  Narrative Reviews Ø  Quality Improvement Projects Ø  Case Studies Ø  Reports from expert committees Ø  Opinions from experts Ø  Specialist opinions Ø  Editorials Ø  Scoping Reviews
This level represents a variety of non-research-based evidence and generally includes reports from expert committees and/or opinions of authorities on the subject. The evidence in this level includes specialists’ opinions, case studies, practice guidelines, narrative reviews, editorials, regulations, legislation, program outcome data, quality improvement projects, and scoping reviews.