MPGO Essay

MPGO Essay-MANAGING PEOPLE IN GLOBAL ORGANISATIONS

1. ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW

Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee

Note: Every paper is crafted by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.

The assessment for this module will consist of a 3000 word essay, and your answer should meet all of the learning outcomes of the module as below.
Module Learning Outcomes:

1. Critically analyse the aims of International Human Resource Management (IHRM) and its contribution to international organisational strategy and effective performance within a global context
2. Identify, analyse and articulate key challenges associated with managing people in global organizations
3. Critically evaluate organisational strategies for managing people in global organisations
4. Critically discuss practices and interventions utilised to effectively, efficiently and ethically manage people in global organisations.
   Your submission deadline is as follows:
   Table 1 Assessment Schedule
   Submission Date Form of assessment Weighting
   3rd May 2022 3000 Word Essay – submit through Turnitin complete with cover sheet and plagiarism checklist 100%
5. ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

The essay takes an ‘applied’ approach. This means you are expected to engage with theoretical concepts and academic studies for the purpose of informing International Human Resource Management strategy and practice. In this way, you should be able to develop yourconsultancy skills, adding value to the organisations you (will) work for. More precisely, you are asked to critically discuss an IHRM strategy and practice with a view to making recommendations on how best to implement it in a global organisation operating between two specific countries. Please ensure you do not select a topic which could overlap significantly with your dissertation, as you cannot be assessed for the same piece of work twice.
Accordingly, you should answer the following question:
‘Critically discuss and evaluate the approach a global organisation headquartered in Country X could take in implementing strategies and practices around (1) equality and diversity management OR (2) leadership OR (3) human resource development OR (4) performance management OR (5) employment relations OR (6) talent management OR (7) rewards management within its subsidiaries in Country Y. Your answer should conclude with recommendations’.
All students should critique:
• International Human Resource Management theory, e.g. IHRM models and strategies, convergence/divergence approaches, ethical debates etc.as appropriate. Remember, human resource management is not the same as business management or domestic HRM. IHRM concerns the approaches to managing employees in organisations across different countries and your critical discussion should reflect the nuances of this.
• One specific IHRM strategy and practice with attention to literature on the challenges of implementing it within an international context, i.e. one out of:(1) equality and diversity management; (2) global leadership; (3) international human resource development; (4) global performance management; (5) international employment relations; (6) global talent management; or (7) global rewards. You can narrow the IHRM strategy and practice into an area which is more specific. This can be done at your discretion, depending on your area of interest and the amount of depth you think is appropriate. Please see your lecture material on each topic from weeks 5-11 for ideas. For example, global talent management could be narrowed down to specific elements such as talent attraction, recruitment or selection if desired.
• The IHRM strategy and practice oftwoseparate countries with attention to organisational, cultural and environmental analysis as appropriate for the topic area.You should select two countries (Country X being the parent country, and Country Ybeing the host country) where you think you will achieve a suitable contrast of IHRM approach, e.g. from two separate continents.
• Specific organisational recommendations. You should imagine that you are acting as a HR Consultant for a global organisation which wants to implement theHRM policy and practicein its foreign subsidiaries, coming up with and critiquing yourspecific recommendations.

3. WRITING THE COURSEWORK:

a) Formative Feedback

To receive formative feedback, you shouldcomplete the proforma available on GCULearn (Appendix 3) and bring this to class in Week 12. The proforma is designed to help you plan the order and contents of your essay, as well as identify suitable preliminary source material.You should briefly identifysix key ideas / arguments you want to discuss in your essay and you should identify one separate key source where you got each point from (please provide a full Harvard reference). You should think about the logical order of these points and how the arguments may flow from one to another (as they would in an essay).

Within the allotted seminar, we will engage in peer discussion and tutor feedback. You should come prepared with your points in the requested format only. While the tutors will manage some peer discussion with your classmates, please remember that you should not share any written work with any other student whether within or outside of the class. You should not have the exact same points or exact same set of references in your essay as anyone else. Please note that one of the definitions of plagiarism is‘collusion with another student or other students’, and this is strictly prohibited.

Discussing the proforma will be your only opportunity to receive thoroughtutor feedback before you submit your final essay for marking. On that basis, try to engage in sufficient levels of reading beforehand to make the six points you choose for the proforma as insightful as possible.

Of course, for your final essay, we will expect you to fully develop these points and to have many more key points and references, but at this stage, identifying six key ideas / arguments is a good starting point. You should use the time in the seminar to think of additional points and make notes on any tutor feedback you receive.

b) 3000 Word Essay

Based on your formative feedback (if applicable), you must write a 3000 word (+/- 10%)essay. Your essay should reflect both taught and self-directed learning.Weeks 1-4 of the programme are designed to give you the foundations of IHRM issues and you are expected to draw on your learning from Weeks 1-4 in your essay where appropriate. You are also expected to draw on your learning from weeks 5-11 of theprogrammewhich align to the seven different HRM functions / topic areas. Although these weeks focus on distinct IHRM functions, certain aspects of the differenttopics and the theoretical input may beinterlinked. The theoretical and conceptual linkages will become clearer as the module progresses and students are expected to be highly selective in their essay writing, demonstrating integrative links in synthesising, critically analysing, and evaluating a range of information and theory while still retaining depth and focus on one chosen IHRM strategy and practice. You must also engage in your own further reading of textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles and reports as appropriate.
Please note that all coursework is subject to a +/- 10% lower and upper limits. GCU guidance states:
For both course works and dissertations, work that is greater than 10% over the word limit specified to the student, 10% of the mark awarded should be deducted.
This means that your essay should have no fewer than 2700 words and no greater than 3300 words or you will be penalised.

You must write your essay using the following structure only:

1. Question Title (please write your question out in full at the top – not included in your word count)
2. Essay (including introduction, main body, conclusions and recommendations all without headings or subheadings) (3000 words +/-10%)
3. References (not included in word count, Harvard style, all named authors)

You must not add in headings, subheadings or appendices. We expect you to write in paragraph structure with appropriate links between paragraphs, i.e.essay writing style. Your essay should flow as one whole piece of work so that the reader is able to ascertain a clear line of argument with no breaks of thought. Please use the MPGO Essay Marking Criteria below for guidance on expected areas of coverage when writing your essay. If you are struggling with how to structure and order your ideas, you may wish to use the marking criteria as a guide in this respect. 

MPGO Essay Marking Criteria Module Learning Outcomes
Introduction:
• Written introduction develops a rationale for discussing IHRM, the specific HRM strategy and practice, countries, and organizational context or case study (if chosen) with references to academic literature.
• Due attention to definition and scope is evidenced.
• Essay aim and contents are outlined. 1. Critically analyse the aims of International Human Resource Management (IHRM) and its contribution to international organisational strategy and effective performance within a global context.

2. Identify, analyse and articulate key challenges associated with managing people in global organisations.
   Critical Discussion:
   • Full and critical discussion of the relevant bodyof theory and debates in relation to IHRM aims, strategies, approaches and contributions to organizational outcomes.
   • Full and critical discussion of the relevant bodyof theory and challenges in relationto implementing the chosen HRM strategy and practice within an international context.
   • Relevant keydebates and challenges (e.g. convergence / divergence, ethnocentrism / polycentrism)are specifically applied to the chosen HRM strategy and practice, with consideration of ethics.
   • Discussionsare theoreticallyrobust,wellscoped,appropriatelydetailedand showevidenceof synthesis from a wide range of appropriate reading. Progressive argument/ideadevelopment.  
   Critical Contextual Analysis and Evaluation:
   • Relevant organisational, cultural and environmental analysis is carried out as appropriate to inform a critical evaluation of strategy and practice in specific relation to the chosen HRM function, industry and countries.
   • Application and critique of convergence/divergence and/or ethnocentrism/polycentrism or related approaches in relation to the specific context is considered.
   • Discussionsare theoreticallyrobust,wellscoped,appropriatelydetailedand showevidenceof synthesis from a wide range of appropriate reading. Progressive argument/ideadevelopment. 3. Critically evaluate organisational strategies for managing people in global organisations.
3. Critically discuss practices and interventions utilised to effectively, efficiently and ethically manage people in global organisations.
   Conclusions and Recommendations:
   • Conclusions are soundly grounded in the preceding discussion.
   • Recommendations are sensible and practical, showing cultural and ethical sensitivities.
   • Awarenessof potentialchallenges andlimitationsevidenced, again, based on preceding arguments.
   Academic Presentation:
   • Observes academic style and essay writing conventions.
   • Excellent structure and cohesion between paragraphs.
   • Excellent citation and referencing style with no errors (Harvard style).
   • Spelling, phrasing and grammar are exemplary.