Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee

Note: Every paper is crafted by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.

NRNP 6675 Week8 Assignment

Check before you submit. Get Turnitin Score Report in 15 Minutes.

Don't risk the 'Red' score. Get the exact same Turnitin report your professor uses. Join 50,000+ students who submitted their essays with confidence this semester.

Get Turnitin Score Report Request Human Rewrite

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

In 2–3 pages, address the following:

• Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released. — Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of student’s state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult emergencies. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague explanation of the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Select one of the following topics and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response accurately and concisely explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response accurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response somewhat vaguely or innacurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response vaguely or innacurately explains one legal and one ethical issue related to the selected topic, within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

•Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients. Attach a copy or a link to the assessment you identified.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response identifies and explains an appropriate, evidence-based suicide risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response identifies an appropriate, evidence-based suicide risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The risk assessment identified is somewhat inappropriate for the intended use or dated. A copy of or a link to the assessment may be missing. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The risk assessment identified is inappropriate for the intended use, not evidence based, or dated. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

• Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients. Attach a copy or a link to the assessment you identified.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response identifies and explains an appropriate, evidence-based violence risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response identifies an appropriate, evidence-based violence risk assessment that could be used to screen patients. A copy of or a link to the assessment is included. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The risk assessment identified is somewhat inappropriate for the intended use or dated. A copy of or a link to the assessment may be missing. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The risk assessment identified is inappropriate for the intended use, not evidence based, or dated. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. — Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation — Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Name: NRNP 6675 Week8 Assignment Rubric

NRNP 6675 Week8 Assignment

TOO MANY ASSIGNMENTS? Let our professional Essay Writers help you!

The art of writing is far from simple; even experienced writers can face challenges. This led to the inception of WriterCentre.com. Comprising a team of writers, we offer comprehensive essay, dissertation, and thesis writing services to students. Our mission at WriterCentre.com is to provide unparalleled quality to clients pursuing undergraduate, Masters, or PhD studies.

Our writers are committed to assisting you through every project phase, from conception to completion. Whether you require topic selection or comprehensive project support, our writers work diligently to ensure your essay, thesis, dissertation, or other projects are delivered punctually. Adhering to your instructions is second nature to our highly trained writers. We understand the stress of impending deadlines, having experienced it ourselves. Hence, we strive to meet even the most challenging timeframes. Do not hesitate to reach out, even when the timeline appears insurmountable. Your academic journey is our concern.

We write essays from scratch and within your selected time frame.